DemocracyCorps has an exciting survey (pdf) of 46 Congressional races of seats currently held by Republicans.
In Tier 1 races, which Democrat Anne Barth’s challenge of Bush Republican Rep. Shelley Moore Capito falls under, the Democratic candidates lead the Republican candidates 51-42.
On issues, from Iraq to the economy, the Democratic stance is favored over the Republican.
For example on the Iraq war, here’s the results for the Democratic position similar to Barth’s versus The Republican position identical to Capito’s.
Here’s Barth’s position:
“We are in our fifth year of the Iraq war with no strategy to win the peace and bring our brave soldiers home. There have been over 4,000 American lives lost, more than a trillion dollars spent, with no end in sight. While I support our troops, I oppose an open-ended commitment to the war in Iraq.
I will work toward a responsible plan to bring our brave men and women home with honor.
We must focus on training the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own security soon, set benchmarks for the Iraqi military, and give more emphasis to diplomatic strategies.
The war in Iraq has had a serious impact on our military, and our brave men and women are stretched thin by extended deployments. In Congress, I will work to strengthen America’s national security and refocus on the terrorist threats around the globe that are currently ignored.”
Here’s Capito’s last public statement
“In recent months we’ve seen hopeful signs of progress on security and localized political reconciliation in Iraq. We want Iraqis to take control and we must continue to apply pressure to Iraq’s national leaders, but now is not the time to pull the rug out from under our troops who are performing admirably and achieving results.”
I point those out to show the similarity between the way the question was asked in the survey.
[800 Respondents]
Q.61 (SPLIT D) Now I’m going to read you what the candidates for Congress are saying on Iraq. Regardless of who you would vote for, please tell me whether the Democratic statement or the Republican statement comes closer to your own view, even if neither is exactly right.The Democratic candidate says the war in Iraq has cost us trillions of dollars while our economy has weakened, and has made America less secure. We must strengthen America’s security by starting to reduce our troops in Iraq in a responsible way, force the Iraqi government to use its oil money to pay for reconstruction and work with other nations to bring stability. We need to invest the money we are currently spending in Iraq to restore our military, deal with Afghanistan and strengthen America’s own economy and security. But the Republican candidate for Congress wants to keep our troops in Iraq for at least another 5 years.
OR
The Republican candidate says there has been military and political progress in Iraq, and that to withdraw now would cost more in lives and create more instability in the Middle East. If we follow John McCain’s lead to see our commitment through until the end of his first term, by 2013 America will have welcomed most of our troops home and the Iraq war will have been won. Though some violence will still occur, Iraq will be a functioning democracy with al Qaeda defeated and the U.S. maintaining just a small military presence that does not play a direct combat role. But the Democratic candidate for Congress wants to pull our troops out precipitously and give al Qaeda a big victory.
Total
Democratic statement strongly – 44
Democratic statement somewhat – 15Republican statement somewhat – 13
Republican statement strongly – 26(Don’t know/refused) – 3
With the numbers rounded that gives 59 percent supporting the Democratic statement and 39 percent supporting the Republic view. Note too how favorably the question was even worded to tilt support for the GOP position.
And keep in mind this was a poll done in Republican held districts.
Hat tip to RandySF for first tipping me to the Democracy Corps poll.
Looks like y’all might just dump Capito!
The only thing keeping Capito afloat is her money bags. She’s got about a $650 k edge on Barth but can expect no outside help. It is sink or swim time. Barth has done a great job of raising funds and visibility in the short time she’s been in the race. She should have at least two other sources of support.
The first is the $40 million advantage the DCCC has over itd Republican counterpart. Divide it 40 ways and all of a sudden Capito is in a financial hole by $350 K. And dead as a doorknob.
The second is an idea I have been trying to talk up. Hillary was bringing in $20 million a month down the stretch with a lot of it coming from small dinors. She, too, could raise $40 million for women candidates and change the landscape of our politics forever. Instead of electing 10 new women to the House we might get 25 and that would be all the difference in the world. Healthcare, education, war, veteran’s benefits, programs for the elderly and the disabled would all face different cirumstances. And these newly elected Representatives would be likely to stay for 10 or 20 years, not judst for 4.
Hello Anne Barth. And Donna Edwards, Chellie Pingree, Farcy Burner, Judy Feder, Tracey Brooks, Kathy Dahlkemper, Siobhan “Sam” Bennett, Christine Jennings, Betsy Markey, Joan Fitz-Gerald, Dina Titus, Debbie Cook, Julie Bornstein, Annette Taddeo, Suzanne Kosmas, Vic Wulsin, Sharen Neuhardt, Mary Jo Kilroy, Debbie Halvorson, Colleen Callahan, Andrea Miller, Ann Kirkpatrick,and Kay Barnes. That’s a quick list of 25 possibles but quite a few other women are certainly alive and possible. Jill Morgenthaler, Anita Hartke, Linda Kettner, Faye Armotage, Regina Thomas, Judy Baker, Alice Kryzan, Heather Ryan and Jennifer Dougherty among others are also good candidates.